The
United States of America owes its political birth to George Washington.
Although I suppose you already knew that. But did you know that
G.W. was also responsible for kick-starting the growth of a domestic
beer industry?
At the heart
of the Colonists’ revolutionary gripes was a discontentment
with Britain’s unfair taxation policies. Though they tried
conventional diplomacy, the colonists had little success in affecting
long-lasting and significant change in the unbalanced trading
relationship between England and America. The Colonials grew alienated
and disgruntled.
Angry
Beer Activists Take Action
Their discontent eventually erupted into acts of civil disobedience.
In the early stages, it wasn’t so much a desire to break
from the Empire, indeed many considered themselves good ale-drinking
Brits - they just wanted to be accorded the same rights as every
other good ale-drinking Brit.
As relations
became increasingly confrontational, and the Revolution began
to foment, Americans realized they must begin to ferment as well.
As America’s colonial days were grinding to an abrupt halt,
the country was heavily dependent on imported supplies of ale.
The
Ultimate Sacrifice
Washington, who had a great thirst for English porter, made the
ultimate sacrifice for his country. In 1774, he supported a bill
drafted by fellow patriot Samuel Adams, called the non-consumption
agreement. The agreement encouraged the colonial population to
abstain from imported goods such as tea, madeira, and port wine,
and likewise encouraged the consumption of American-brewed beer,
so as to curtail imports. Boycotting English imports, including
ale, was a promising strategy, if somewhat hard to swallow for
beer drinking colonists like George Washington and his fellow
Founding Fathers.
Washington’s
perturbations over unfair taxes eventually lead to his dismissal
from the Virginia House of Burgesses. For, in a show of solidarity
with Massachusetts, Washington, along with his fellow legislators
Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Thomas Jefferson, declared June
1, 1774, the day the Port Act sealed off Boston in a commercial
blockade, to be a day of “fasting, humiliation, and prayer.”
In an angry response, the Virginia Governor, a loyalist, promptly
dissolved the Assembly.
Boycotting
Imported Ale
In due haste, George and his mates regrouped at the Raleigh Tavern,
where over beers they composed a proclamation declaring that:
“An
attack on one of our sister colonies, to compel submission to
arbitrary taxes, is an attack made on all British America. That
we will not hereafter, directly or indirectly import, or cause
to be imported, from great Britain, and of the goods hereafter
enumerated, either for sale or for our own use . . . beer, ale,
porter, malt.”
Once the Revolution
had begun in earnest and Washington was Commander of the American
forces, he for a time made his headquarters in the home of George
Emlen just outside of Philadelphia. Given Washington’s penchant
for porter, one must wonder whether it was pure coincidence that
Emlen was a commercial brewer and descendant of one of Philadelphia’s
earliest brewing families.
A
Well-Supped Army
Washington also made sure that soldiers were well supped under
his command. According to a 1775 pronouncement, every soldier
in the new Continental army would receive a ration of “1
quart of spruce beer or cyder per man per day.”
Eventually,
after the successful revolution, Washington made sure to never
be short of porter again by supporting the growth of the local
brewing industry. He grew barley himself, and harvested ice from
his ponds to be used, most likely, for beer related cooling.
He described
his post-war efforts to boost local brewing as follows:
“We
have already been too long subject to British Prejudices. I
use no porter or cheese in my family, but that which is made
in America: both these articles may now be purchased of an excellent
quality.”
According
to numerous records, a certain Robert Hare, brewer of porter in
Philadelphia, had the fortune to be Washington’s regular
beer supplier.
“In
the years preceding his assumption to the Presidency, Washington
was a steady customer of Robert Hare. Son of a porter brewer
in Limehouse, Hare had emigrated to Philadelphia in 1773 with
a gift from his father of £1,500. . . in 1774 he started
brewing porter – probably the first ever made in this
country.
(Baron, Brewed In America, p. 114)
George
to Voters: "My Treat"
Another noteworthy bit regarding Washington’s relationship
with beer appears in Mark Lender and James Martin’s book
Drinking in America. The custom of ‘treating’
citizens to drinks at public gatherings was apparently common
among America’s early politicians. As Lender and Martin
explain:
One did
not seek office at any level without ‘treating’
the electorate during the campaign. Polling places themselves
were rarely dry: there was only one poll per county and after
making the long trek to do his citizen’s duty, the voter
expected some tangible reward. He usually got it. This meant
that to count as a Founding Father, George Washington . . .
must have provided many a drink for the multitude.
(Lender & Martin, Drinking in America, p10)
One
Ballot, One Beer
Given the dismal voter turnout levels in contemporary American
elections, perhaps this is a strategy that we might consider rediscovering.
One ballot, one beer. Imagine the increase in voter participation.
Whiskey
Rebels
Unfortunately, there is at least one spot which mars the first
President’s record on alcohol and taxation: the Whiskey
Rebellion. The new American central government found itself in
the uncomfortable situation of needing to emulate the very British
behavior which sparked the Revolution.
The budding
American government needed cash to fund its activities. As the
British well knew, alcohol was a veritable tax revenue jackpot,
and so Washington followed their example and imposed a whiskey
tax. Frontiersmen making their new lives across the Appalachian
range in places like Western Pennsylvania were outraged by what
they probably rightly perceived as an unfair tax by a faraway
government. These frontiersmen were grain and whiskey rich, but
cash poor, making a cash tax a particular hardship.
In addition
to homebrewing, Washington was also a voluminous whiskey distiller.
It may have been that Washington’s private interests in
the commercial whiskey market clouded his commitment to public
service in this matter. Multitudes of home distillers producing
tax-free whiskey could surely have been seen as competition for
Washington’s own distillery, not to mention the many other
politician-distillers comprising his first government.
When Pennsylvanians
near Pittsburgh rebelled openly and violently against this tax,
Washington responded by crushing them with a hastily assembled
national army. And so the long tradition of bathtub moonshine
and tax evasion began.
The
Revolution Lives On
However, Washington’s efforts to encourage a domestic brewing
industry were indeed quite successful. By 1873, America boasted
4,131 commercial breweries, plus countless private home breweries.
Unfortunately, the country went through a bad hangover after prohibition
and combined with corporate brewery consolidation reduced America's
total number of breweries to fewer than fifty by the 1970s.
But the revolution
lives on in the modern revival of craft brewing. Today America
can again boast as many as 1,420 craft breweries. Visit one today
and join the revolution.